21.fun
MotoGP

Marini Targets MotoGP Calendar Structure, Not Race Count

Luca Marini says the real issue with MotoGP's packed schedule isn't the 22 grands prix themselves, but how they are arranged, leaving riders no recovery time.

MotoGP Correspondent · · 2 min read
MotoGP rider on a factory prototype bike during a race weekend, pit lane in the background
Share
Advertisementabove content article

Marini Points the Finger at Scheduling, Not Volume

Luca Marini has spoken out about the demands of the current MotoGP calendar, making clear that his frustration is not with the number of races on the schedule. The Repsol Honda rider told GPOne.com that 22 grands prix is not the core problem. The issue, he argued, is how those rounds are stacked and sequenced throughout the season, with gaps so tight that riders and teams have almost no window to regroup between events.

His comments reflect a growing concern in the paddock about the physical and logistical toll of modern MotoGP. The championship has expanded steadily over recent years, and while 22 rounds represents a demanding workload by any measure, Marini's point is more specific. Back-to-back race weekends and short turnarounds between flyaway rounds leave crews and riders unable to properly analyze data, address technical issues, or recover physically before the next event begins.

"The problem isn't the 22 GPs, but the calendar. There's no time to catch up," Marini was quoted as saying by GPOne.com.

What the Argument Actually Means for Teams

The distinction Marini draws matters in practical terms. A 22-round season spread with adequate breathing room between events would allow engineers to run thorough debriefs, mechanics to service machinery properly, and riders to train and manage any physical niggles. Compressed back-to-back formats remove that buffer entirely.

For a rider like Marini, who is working through a challenging adaptation period with Honda after moving from the Ducati setup, the lack of recovery time between races is especially costly. Any weekend that doesn't go to plan leaves almost no space to reset before the next round is already underway. Problems compound rather than get resolved.

This is not purely a rider welfare argument either. Teams operating across multiple classes and running satellite programs face significant strain when the logistics of one race weekend bleed directly into preparation for the next. The human cost is real, but so is the technical one.

A Broader Debate in the Paddock

Marini is not the only voice raising these concerns, though his framing is more precise than most. Rather than calling for fewer races, which would reduce commercial revenue and exposure for the sport, he is effectively asking for smarter spacing. That is a more constructive position and one that promoters and the FIM could, in theory, act on without cutting the number of events.

MotoGP's commercial growth has pushed the calendar outward geographically, with rounds in Asia, the Americas, and the Middle East now sitting alongside the traditional European heartland. That geographic spread makes bunching almost inevitable at certain points of the year, particularly when manufacturers and teams want European rounds concentrated in summer months.

Whether Dorna and the FIM will revisit the calendar structure in response to paddock feedback remains to be seen. But Marini's comments, reported by GPOne.com, give that conversation a sharper edge heading into the second half of the season.

Advertisementbelow article mobile
Luca Moretti

MotoGP Correspondent

Luca Moretti is 21.fun's MotoGP correspondent, following the championship from free practice to the podium with an eye for race strategy and tech.

More from MotoGP